Lamar Alford

No physical, forensic, or weapons evidence

No physical evidence linked Mr. Alford to the crime and no forensic evidence connected him to the scene. No murder weapon was ever recovered that tied him to the shooting.

Sworn alibi from mother and girlfriend

Gloria Alford and Ayesha Rivera both provided sworn affidavits stating that Lamar and Ayesha arrived at Gloria's house from South Camden by 9:00 p.m. on May 22, 2005 and did not leave again that night. The murder occurred at approximately 9:50 p.m. in East Camden, meaning he could not have committed it.

Alternative suspect Elijah Mack

Elijah Mack had ongoing conflicts with Salvador Martinez over drug territory disputes near 31st and Rosedale, was seen in the immediate vicinity roughly 30 minutes before the shooting, and had no verifiable alibi. Witness Dia Singletary told investigators the day after the murder that a man called "Ghost" or "Ghostface" committed it, and records show Mack used the street name "Ghostface."

Physical description mismatch

Witnesses described the taller perpetrator as approximately 6 feet tall. Mr. Alford's height and build do not match that description as closely as Mack's physical characteristics.

Uninvestigated "Romulo" lead

Juana Montes told investigators she heard at the victim's funeral that "Romulo" committed the murder, that Daysi Jarquin said the victim owed her son Romulo money, and that she had witnessed Romulo and the victim fight. Investigators never followed up on this lead.

"Ghostface" lead abandoned

Investigators interviewed brothers Melvin and Gregory Banner, who used the nicknames "Ghost" and "Ghostface," and Gregory admitted he had spoken to Carol Lofland about the Martinez homicide. Investigators never followed up with Lofland or conducted any identification procedures regarding "Ghostface" with eyewitnesses.

Kim's post-trial plea agreement

On Monday, March 12, 2007 — the first business day after Thia Kim's March 8, 2007 testimony and two days after the guilty verdicts — the State entered a plea agreement reducing Kim's third-degree weapons charges and recommending probation. The jury never learned of this arrangement.

Martin Devlin's later perjury charge and misconduct pattern

In 2021 Martin Devlin, who supervised the identification procedures and signed off on "almost all of the supplemental reports," was charged with perjury in Philadelphia and has been connected to "countless wrongful convictions" in Pennsylvania. Philadelphia Inquirer reporting describes his pattern of not documenting witness communications and then coaching witnesses to give incriminating statements.

Frank Falco's history of fabricating evidence

Frank Falco, who participated in witness interviews in Mr. Alford's case and helped ensure Jacob Eller testified, was involved in at least one other wrongful conviction and had a conviction reversed after fabricating an audiotape of an interview with a purported murder witness.

Brady/Giglio violation as to Thia Kim

Kim testified he was "receiving no favorable treatment from the State" and was not "expecting it" while facing pending third-degree weapons charges, yet received a favorable plea within 96 hours of testifying. The defense could not cross-examine him about his expectation of benefits because prosecutors concealed that the deal was imminent.

Concealed incentives for Jacob Eller

Eller contacted prosecutors from Burlington County Jail in November 2005 seeking "help on his pending criminal charges," and stated he only helped investigators because he believed they would help him. Investigator Greer nonetheless testified that "no promises were made to Thia Kim or Jacob Eller concerning the charges pending against them."

Prosecutorial interference with cross-examination

At sidebar the prosecutor warned defense counsel: "Judge, if he delves too much into this, [counsel] is going to get a surprise and he's going to say something of being scared of the defendants." Defense counsel abandoned the line of inquiry, and the jury never learned the full extent of Eller's motivation to cooperate.

Single-photo showups instead of lineups

Camden County Prosecutor's Office investigators, supervised by Martin Devlin and conducted by John Greer, showed witnesses single photographs of Mr. Alford and his co-defendant rather than proper photo arrays or live lineups, in violation of New Jersey Attorney General Guidelines. Greer admitted he had never conducted a live lineup in 25 years of law enforcement.

Coerced custodial identification by Carol Lofland

Lofland first said she did not recognize the perpetrators, then refused to identify anyone out of fear, telling investigators "drug boys" and detectives were pressuring her and demanding "open the door and let me out, I'm going to leave." On June 24, 2005, while jailed on unrelated charges and unable to make a $300 bail, she was brought to the prosecutor's office and identified Mr. Alford from a single photograph.

Threatened identification by Thia Kim

Kim initially said that "because it was dark" he "could not see the faces of the subjects" and had no proof who the perpetrators were. After investigators threatened to subpoena him to a grand jury and told his mother the same, he changed his position within about an hour and identified Mr. Alford from a single photograph.

No adequate suppression hearings

The trial court admitted the identifications without adequate suppression hearings despite procedures that violated multiple constitutional protections and New Jersey identification guidelines.

Ineffective assistance of trial counsel

Trial counsel Edward Crisonino failed to move to suppress the constitutionally defective identifications, abandoned cross-examination of Eller on plea benefits after the prosecutor's warning, and placed both alibi witnesses on the witness list and had them wait outside the courtroom but never called them. Mr. Alford confronted his attorney about the alibi failure at the April 27, 2007 sentencing.

Tunnel-vision investigation

Investigators failed to investigate Mack's whereabouts, interview corroborating witnesses, include Mack's photo in arrays, examine the Mack–Martinez conflicts, or follow up on Dia Singletary's "Ghostface" statement. Police focused exclusively on Mr. Alford and ignored evidence to the contrary.

Prosecutor conceded witnesses' unreliability

In opening statements Assistant Prosecutor Ira Slovin told the jury the witnesses "are not school teachers, not scout leaders. They are drug dealers and substance abusers." Defense counsel argued the case was "heavy with issues of contradiction and credibility" and that witnesses were "by their own admission either drunk or high on crack at the time of Martinez's killing."

Lillian Davis could not see faces

Davis testified she witnessed the shooting from 15 to 20 feet away but admitted she could not see the perpetrators' faces because it was dark: "I can't identify them. I didn't see no faces." Her account changed over time and included a claim of feeling the vibration of the body hitting the ground, suggesting exaggeration or coaching.

Unexplored "setup" statement

Davis testified that after the shooting Carol Lofland yelled "I told you it was a setup, I told you it was a setup." The court sustained a hearsay objection and told the jury to disregard it, but the statement suggests Lofland had advance knowledge of the attack and contradicts the State's theory of a spontaneous robbery.

Carol Lofland's evolving account

Lofland moved from saying she saw no faces and did not recognize the perpetrators, to refusing to identify anyone out of fear, to identifying Mr. Alford as "Bling" and claiming she had "known him for years" only after being jailed and transported to the prosecutor's office.

Thia Kim's compromised viewing conditions

Kim testified he saw the perpetrators' faces for "a couple of seconds, a minute or so" as they ran past him in the park, but had been drinking malt liquor and only looked up after hearing a cracking noise. The lighting, alcohol consumption, and brief viewing opportunity undermine his identification.

Jacob Eller's uncorroborated jailhouse account

Eller, described as a crack-addicted informant, was the only witness who claimed to have heard Mr. Alford discuss the crime beforehand, and the prosecution's drug-debt motive theory rested solely on his uncorroborated testimony. The day before he was scheduled to testify he sought immediate release from a warrant, saying he was afraid for his "family."