Skip to main content
onorate

Exonerated

Sean Washington

Spotlight case — not a Xonorate client

Nearly 25 years (arrested March 21, 1995 — released February 11, 2020)

Lost

New Jersey

Camden County

Murder, Conspiracy, Illegal Use of a Weapon

Conviction

Sean Washington

25

Years wrongly imprisoned

18

Years his own 911 call went unidentified

$1.25M

State compensation settlement

“Our independent review of the record, in light of the newly discovered evidence, compels us to conclude it would be unjust to allow this verdict to stand.”

Case intelligence

The facts, the evidence, the open questions.

The facts, evidence, developments, and unanswered questions surrounding this case.

The story

Shortly before 6 a.m. on January 28, 1995, an unidentified caller reported finding two bodies in a pool of blood in Camden's Roosevelt Manor housing complex. Rodney Turner, 35, and Margaret Wilson, 40, had both been shot in the head. Five days later, based on street rumor, police arrested Sean Washington and Kevin Baker, then both 23, largely on the word of a single eyewitness, Denise Rand, who was high on crack cocaine at the time of the shooting and gave inconsistent, wavering testimony at trial. Washington and Baker were convicted after a two-day trial in August 1996 and sentenced to 60 years to life. Washington had in fact called 911 himself that morning after discovering the bodies while walking to a nearby pay phone, fearing one victim was his nephew — but that call went unidentified for 18 years. Beginning in 2011, the Last Resort Exoneration Project at Seton Hall Law School uncovered the 911 recording and new ballistics and forensic analysis showing both victims were shot at close range while on the ground, directly contradicting Rand's account of them being shot while running. In December 2019, the New Jersey Appellate Division unanimously vacated both convictions, finding the new evidence "powerfully undermines" Rand's testimony. Camden County prosecutors declined to retry the case, and Washington and Baker were released on February 11, 2020, after nearly 25 years in prison.

What we know

Murder, Conspiracy, Illegal Use of a Weapon

Conviction, 1996

60 years to life

Sentence

New Jersey

State

Camden

County

Black

Race / ethnicity

Male

Sex

23

Age at time of crime

No

DNA evidence involved

What raises questions

The case rested on a single eyewitness, Denise Rand, who was under the influence of crack cocaine at the time of the shooting and gave inconsistent testimony at trial about what she saw and who she was with. Sergeant Washington's own 911 call reporting the bodies went unidentified for nearly two decades and was never turned over to the defense. His trial lawyer testified at a later hearing that he did very little to investigate Washington's account, never interviewed the witnesses Washington named, and never consulted a forensic pathologist or firearms expert.

Perjury or false accusationFalse or misleading forensic evidenceInadequate legal defense

The evidence

Evidence of innocence

Washington made the 911 call himself

The unidentified 911 caller who reported finding the bodies was, in fact, Washington — he had gone to a nearby pay phone and spotted the victims on the way, fearing one was his nephew. Multiple witnesses later identified his voice on the recording, and his trial defense lawyer, once played the tape, said it was "absolutely clear" it was Washington.

A corroborated alibi never presented to the jury

Washington's cousin, Dwight Collins, testified at a post-conviction hearing that Washington was at his mother's house cooking chicken minutes before the shooting, left to use a pay phone, and returned "very emotional" and "crying" after seeing the bodies. Several other witnesses corroborated this account, but it was never presented to the original trial jury.

Newly discovered evidence

Forensic reconstruction contradicted the eyewitness

In 2013, prosecutors turned over discovery that included the 911 call for the first time. Forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden and firearms expert Lucien Haag later testified that bullet trajectories and "bow effect" ricochet scoring on the recovered bullets showed victim Margaret Wilson was shot while lying on the ground — directly contradicting eyewitness Denise Rand's account that she saw the victims shot while standing and fleeing.

Statements undermining the eyewitness's credibility

Two acquaintances of Denise Rand, both since deceased, gave statements that shortly after the 1996 trial, Rand told them she had not actually been present at or witnessed the murders.

Due-process violations

Undocumented interrogation and photo identification

Police interrogated witnesses Denise Rand and Tyrone Moore separately after an informant's tip, and the photo display procedure that led to Rand naming Washington and Baker was never documented.

Inadequate trial defense

Washington's trial attorney, Michael Kahn, later testified he did very little to investigate Washington's account: he never interviewed the witnesses Washington named, never determined a timeline of events, and never consulted a forensic pathologist, firearms examiner, or shooting-reconstruction expert.

Unreliable evidence

Sole eyewitness was impaired and inconsistent

The prosecution's own opening called it a "one-witness case." Denise Rand admitted she had smoked crack cocaine roughly two hours before the shooting and typically smoked every two to three hours. Her trial testimony repeatedly changed on cross-examination, including who she was with, where they were standing, and which defendant she said shot which victim — she needed her own prior police statement read back to her to attribute the shootings at all.

An unreliable polygraph used against a rival account

Rand's cousin, Tyrone Moore, initially told police he and Rand were blocks away when they heard the shots — an account matching other witnesses. An uncredentialed polygraph examiner then issued a report concluding Moore was lying, which was used to discount his contradicting account. Rand herself was never given a polygraph.

Case timeline

  1. 1996

    Conviction

    Murder, Conspiracy, Illegal Use of a Weapon

  2. 2020

    Exoneration

    Starting in 2011, the Last Resort Exoneration Project at Seton Hall Law School re-investigated the case and obtained the 911 call recording, which multiple witnesses identified as Washington's own voice reporting the bodies. Forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden and firearms expert Lucien Haag testified that bullet trajectories, ricochet "bow effect" scoring, and soil mineralization on the recovered bullets showed Wilson had been shot while lying on the ground — directly contradicting Rand's trial testimony that she saw the victims shot while standing and running. On December 26, 2019, the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court unanimously vacated both convictions, finding the new evidence "powerfully undermines" Rand's account. The Camden County Prosecutor's Office declined to retry the case, and a judge dismissed all charges on February 11, 2020. Washington later settled a state compensation claim for $1.25 million.

Where it stands

Exonerated

Starting in 2011, the Last Resort Exoneration Project at Seton Hall Law School re-investigated the case and obtained the 911 call recording, which multiple witnesses identified as Washington's own voice reporting the bodies. Forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden and firearms expert Lucien Haag testified that bullet trajectories, ricochet "bow effect" scoring, and soil mineralization on the recovered bullets showed Wilson had been shot while lying on the ground — directly contradicting Rand's trial testimony that she saw the victims shot while standing and running. On December 26, 2019, the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court unanimously vacated both convictions, finding the new evidence "powerfully undermines" Rand's account. The Camden County Prosecutor's Office declined to retry the case, and a judge dismissed all charges on February 11, 2020. Washington later settled a state compensation claim for $1.25 million.

Take action

No active petition for this case yet.

Email
Support this case

Sources & records

Case information presented by Xonorate is based on available court records, case materials, reporting, and other documented sources.

Want to understand the issues surrounding this case?

Ask Xonorate can help you explore the research, legal framework, and related Xonorate material.

Ask Xonorate →

More cases

Comments

Sign in to leave a comment.

Stay informed. Stay involved.

Get the latest updates on cases, petitions, and justice reform.